Re: Moonrise
Posted by wingman1 on May 04, 2004 at 11:12:30:
In Reply to: Re: Moonrise posted by Harold Ericsson on May 04, 2004 at 10:01:45:
Unfortunately I don't think there's any substitute for pixels. Do you use a photo editing software like Photoshop or Photosuite? I've had some good results with Photoshop. It can be a little tedious though. The other one I would suggest would be; believe it or not Microsoft Picture It. Something Microsoft got right for once, at least on the color/photo enhancement side. For some reason it does a really good job in that area. The rest of the program is just so so. If you have the time, I'd re-scan it (at the highest setting) then try to manipulate it with one of the above programs. The only other problem I could think of is that depending on your film speed, shooting through a 600mm lens with a high speed film, say 400 ASA or higher, it’s just going to be “grainy” the larger you go (again, pixel count).
- Het begint op een vendetta te lijken, dat geeft niet hoor maar Dr. Phil zou zeggen Y Status 17:32:01 11/17/04
(0)
- What?, don't they know who we are? Y Status 17:31:41 11/17/04
(0)
- Were there ever real witches? Clay Poker Chips 10:16:38 09/09/04
(0)
- This is a very influential speculative novel of Clay Poker Chips 10:16:34 09/09/04
(0)
- And now the description is wrong. Order Business 22:12:53 08/07/04
(0)
- Hehe, ik dacht ook meteen aan dat beetje invloed op Rogaine 18:08:06 07/25/04
(0)
- And now the description is wrong. patrick paul 12:47:01 07/07/04
(0)
- Re: Moonrise Harold Ericsson 11:45:44 05/04/04
(0)